<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>Sendlens Blog</title>
    <link>https://sendlens.com/blog/</link>
    <atom:link href="https://sendlens.com/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <description>Notes from the Sendlens team on email analytics, campaign intelligence, and the ESPs we all work inside of.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2026 19:42:10 GMT</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>5 ActiveCampaign reporting limitations marketers hit in 2026</title>
      <link>https://sendlens.com/blog/activecampaign-reporting-limitations-2026/</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://sendlens.com/blog/activecampaign-reporting-limitations-2026/</guid>
      <description>ActiveCampaign is a strong sender. But once operators get past the basic campaign report, five specific gaps keep showing up in our calls — and each one has the same shape: the answer lives outside the ESP.</description>
      <category>Comparison</category>
      <dc:creator>Thierry from Sendlens</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Newsletter vs promotional email: why the same benchmarks mislead both</title>
      <link>https://sendlens.com/blog/newsletter-vs-promotional-email-benchmarks/</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://sendlens.com/blog/newsletter-vs-promotional-email-benchmarks/</guid>
      <description>The single most common mistake we see in email analytics is comparing a newsletter to a flash sale and treating the gap as performance. Clusters fix the apples-to-apples problem without asking marketers to redo their taxonomy by hand.</description>
      <category>Product</category>
      <dc:creator>Thierry from Sendlens</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The email marketing analytics gap: by design, not by accident</title>
      <link>https://sendlens.com/blog/email-marketing-analytics-gap/</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://sendlens.com/blog/email-marketing-analytics-gap/</guid>
      <description>Email platforms are very good at sending email. They&apos;re less good at telling you why one email outperformed another. That isn&apos;t an accident — it&apos;s a consequence of what they were built for.</description>
      <category>Landscape</category>
      <dc:creator>Thierry from Sendlens</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Email automation analytics: why a flow is a sequence, not a list</title>
      <link>https://sendlens.com/blog/email-automation-flow-analytics/</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://sendlens.com/blog/email-automation-flow-analytics/</guid>
      <description>Most analytics treat the emails in an onboarding flow as independent campaigns. That&apos;s the wrong unit of analysis — and it hides the one question automation teams actually need answered.</description>
      <category>Landscape</category>
      <dc:creator>Thierry from Sendlens</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Why most email A/B tests don&apos;t teach you anything</title>
      <link>https://sendlens.com/blog/why-most-email-ab-tests-dont-teach-anything/</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://sendlens.com/blog/why-most-email-ab-tests-dont-teach-anything/</guid>
      <description>A/B testing is the default answer to &quot;what should we try next.&quot; It also quietly rewards noise as if it were insight. Here&apos;s why most email A/B tests teach almost nothing — and what actually produces learning.</description>
      <category>Landscape</category>
      <dc:creator>Thierry from Sendlens</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
